NCA Canadian Criminal Law Practice Exam 2025 - Free Criminal Law Practice Questions and Study Guide

Forcible confinement pertains specifically to the unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement. It is a criminal offense in Canadian law that occurs when an individual is intentionally confined against their will. This type of confinement does not require any physical violence; the mere act of forcibly restricting someone's liberty can constitute this offense.

In the context of the other options, the first choice, which involves restricting someone's movement with their consent, does not apply because consent nullifies the element of unlawfulness needed for forcible confinement. The second choice referencing waiting for someone's consent does not reflect active confinement; rather, it suggests a passive situation that does not meet the criteria for the offense. Finally, casually preventing someone from entering an area does not imply a confinement scenario since it does not involve the direct and unlawful restriction of a person already in a confined situation.

Thus, the essence of forcible confinement lies in the unlawful nature of restricting someone's freedom, making the correct answer particularly relevant in understanding this aspect of criminal law.